POWER-READINESS REVIEWS / AEP OHIO FIRST
ModGrid Start a review

MODULAR POWER SYSTEM / CONCEPT MODEL

Find a credible
path to power.

Power-readiness reviews for AI data center sites.

  • Readiness review
  • Live telemetry
  • Curtailment proof
From$7,500Planning estimate

FIXED-SCOPE REVIEW

Book a readiness review
01 / THE DECISION

A power plan starts with the site.

The grid is complex.
Your next move
should be clear.

Utility service. Contract exposure. Equipment. Flexible demand. A credible plan connects them.

We help developers and engineering teams compare the paths, name the dependencies, and decide what needs proving.

02 / THE PATH

Plan. Prove.
Participate.

Start with the decision.
Build toward operating evidence.

01
Start here

Power-readiness review

Compare utility service, on-site supply and flexible demand. Understand the commitments before you commit capital.

Read the sample brief
02
Product preview

Flex-Ready

Track obligations and live telemetry. Record the response that shows a site can reduce grid imports when asked.

Explore the product
03
Later

Flexibility earnings

Turn accepted response into market participation through qualified partners. Eligibility and measured delivery come first.

No earnings or enrollment are promised.
03 / FLEX-READYPRODUCT PREVIEW

Flexibility
needs evidence.

One record of the obligation,
the response, and what remains open.

◇ Example data
Example Flex-Ready site-readiness screen. Site A has 90 MW approved, 30 MW in study, and three unresolved evidence gaps.

Separate approved service from an expansion still in study.

Open full screen in a new tab
Requested / example120 MW
Approved / example90 MW
Response / example18 MW
Response window / example5 min

Fictional site and operating data. Product concept, not an operating customer. Final compliance requires accepted measurement and review.

04 / WHERE WE START

Local rules.
Specific answers.

AEP Ohio and PJM first.
ERCOT under Texas SB 6 next.

Review the load ramp, tariff exposure and utility-study dependencies for a specific Ohio site.

Geographic context: the contiguous United States, with Ohio and Texas highlighted. Columbus is the initial focus; ERCOT in Texas is next.

Geographic context. State outlines are not service boundaries or available power.

05 / THE REVIEWDOCUMENTS → DECISION

Bring a site.
Leave with a next step.

View the example brief
  1. 01

    Share the project.

    Your site, load ramp, utility correspondence and decision deadline.

  2. 02

    Compare the paths.

    Service options, contract exposure and dependencies, with specialist review where needed.

  3. 03

    Know what to prove.

    A decision brief, supporting sources and an open-issues list with clear owners.

06 / THE RECORDRESEARCH / 04 NOV 2026

Facts, with
the fine print.

Public evidence shapes the review.
It cannot establish power at your site.

45 or 60 days

AEP Ohio study targets

Depending on transmission needs. A study target is not an energization date.

AEP Ohio tariff and process opens in a new tab
75 MW

Texas SB 6 threshold

For the large-load demand-reduction service. Site obligations depend on the law and implementing rules.

Texas SB 6, enrolled text opens in a new tab

The $7,500 starting price is a planning estimate from ModGrid's proposed $7,500 to $20,000 review range. Scope and fees need agreement. It is not a validated market rate or a power-delivery guarantee. Read the research and sources ↗

THE NEXT DECISION

Let's look
at your site.

Start with the location,
the load and the question.

Paid power-readiness review.
AEP Ohio / PJM first.

Local preview. Nothing is sent or stored.